名錄

Global database of alien macrofungi

最新版本 由 CIBIO (Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources) Portugal 發佈於 2020年2月18日 CIBIO (Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources) Portugal

下載最新版本的 Darwin Core Archive (DwC-A) 資源,或資源詮釋資料的 EML 或 RTF 文字檔。

DwC-A資料集 下載 679 紀錄 在 English 中 (200 KB) - 更新頻率: 有可能更新,但不確知何時
元數據EML檔 下載 在 English 中 (52 KB)
元數據RTF文字檔 下載 在 English 中 (27 KB)

說明

This dataset contains comprehensive information about the global alien spread and distribution of macrofungi species during the last centuries (1753-2018)

資料紀錄

此資源名錄的資料已發佈為達爾文核心集檔案(DwC-A),其以一或多組資料表構成分享生物多樣性資料的標準格式。 核心資料表包含 679 筆紀錄。

亦存在 1 筆延伸集的資料表。延伸集中的紀錄補充核心集中紀錄的額外資訊。 每個延伸集資料表中資料筆數顯示如下。

Taxon (核心)
679
Occurrence 
1966

此 IPT 存放資料以提供資料儲存庫服務。資料與資源的詮釋資料可由「下載」單元下載。「版本」表格列出此資源的其它公開版本,以便利追蹤其隨時間的變更。

版本

以下的表格只顯示可公開存取資源的已發布版本。

如何引用

研究者應依照以下指示引用此資源。:

Monteiro M, Reino L, Schertler A, Essl F, Ferreira M T, Figueira R, Capinha C (2019): Global database of alien macrofungi. v1.2. CIBIO (Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources) Portugal. Dataset/Checklist. http://ipt.gbif.pt/ipt/resource?r=global_database_alien_macrofungi&v=1.2

權利

研究者應尊重以下權利聲明。:

此資料的發布者及權利單位為 CIBIO (Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources) Portugal。 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY 4.0) License.

GBIF 註冊

此資源已向GBIF註冊,並指定以下之GBIF UUID: da3542b4-9a73-4054-b9a3-2d762e172199。  CIBIO (Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources) Portugal 發佈此資源,並經由GBIF Portugal同意向GBIF註冊成為資料發佈者。

關鍵字

Introduced species; biological invasions; fungal biogeography; species occurrence data; Checklist; Globalspeciesdataset

聯絡資訊

Miguel Monteiro
  • 元數據提供者
Phd Student
CIBIO/INBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos,Universidade do Porto
Campus Agrário de Vairão, Rua Padre Armando Quintas, nº 7
4485‑661 Porto
PT
Luís Reino
  • 元數據提供者
  • 出處
Research Fellow
CIBIO/InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto
Campus Agrário de Vairão, Rua Padre Armando Quintas, nº 7
4485‑661 Porto
PT
Anna Schertler
  • 元數據提供者
PhD Student
Division of Conservation Biology, Vegetation Ecology and Landscape Ecology, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna
Rennweg 14, 1030
Vienna
AT
Franz Essl
  • 元數據提供者
  • 出處
Assistant Professor
Division of Conservation Biology, Vegetation Ecology and Landscape Ecology, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna
Rennweg 14, 1030
Vienna
AT
Maria Teresa Ferreira
  • 元數據提供者
  • 出處
Professor
Centro de Estudos Florestais, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa
Tapada da Ajuda
1349-017 Lisboa
PT
Rui Figueira
  • 元數據提供者
  • 出處
GBIF Node Manager for Portugal
LEAF-Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa
Tapada da Ajuda
1349-017 Lisboa
PT
César Capinha
  • 元數據提供者
  • 出處
Research Fellow
Centro de Estudos Geográficos, Instituto de Geografia e Ordenamento do Território - IGOT, Universidade de Lisboa
Rua Branca Edmée Marques
1600-276 Lisboa
PT
Miguel Monteiro
  • 元數據提供者
Phd student
CIBIO/InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade de Lisboa
Campus Agrário de Vairão, Rua Padre Armando Quintas, nº 7
4485‑661 Porto
PT
Anna Schertler
  • 元數據提供者
Phd student
Division of Conservation Biology, Vegetation Ecology and Landscape Ecology, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna
Rennweg 14, 1030
Vienna
AT

地理涵蓋範圍

Countries and the first-order administrative divisions of the six largest countries in the world (Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Russia and United States). Antarctica is not included

界定座標範圍 緯度南界 經度西界 [-90, -180], 緯度北界 經度東界 [90, 180]

分類群涵蓋範圍

All macromycetes were identified to species level. There are also some inclusions of records reporting varieties, forms or subspecies. All mispellings have been corrected. Nomenclatural updates are maintained based on the indexfungorum database (http://www.indexfungorum.org) and mycobank (http://www.mycobank.org).

Kingdom Fungi
Phylum Ascomycota, Basidomycota
Class Agarocomycetes, Dacrymycetes, Dothideomycetes, Pezizomycetes, Sordariomycetes, Tremellomycetes
Order Agaricales, Amylocorticiales, Auriculariales, Boletales, Cantharellales, Dacrymycetales, Diaporthales, Geastrales, Gloeophyllales, Gomphales, Helotiales, Hymenochaetales, Hypocreales, Hysterangiales, Pezizales, Phallales, Pleosporales, Polyporales, Russulales, Thelephorales, Xylariales, Agaricaceae, Albatrellaceae, Amanitaceae, Amylostereaceae, Auriculariaceae, Bankeraceae, Bolbitiaceae, Boletaceae, Bondarzewiaceae, Cantharellaceae, Clavariaceae, Clavulinaceae, Coniophoraceae, Cortinariaceae, Cucurbitariaceae, Cyphellaceae, Dacrymycetaceae, Diaporthaceae, Diplocystidiaceae, Discinaceae, Entolomataceae, Fomitopsidaceae, Ganodermataceae, Gastrosporiaceae, Geastraceae, Gelatinodiscaceae, Gloeophyllaceae, Gomphaceae, Gomphidiaceae, Gyroporaceae, Helotiaceae, Helvellaceae, Hydnaceae, Hydnangiaceae, Hygrophoraceae, Hymenochaetaceae, Hymenogastraceae, Hypoxylaceae, Hysterangiaceae, Inocybaceae, Lachnaceae, Marasmiaceae, Meripilaceae, Meruliaceae, Mesophelliaceae, Morchellaceae, Mycenaceae, Nectriaceae, Omphalotaceae, Paxillaceae, Pezizaceae, Phallaceae, Phallogastraceae, Phelloriniaceae, Physalacriaceae, Pleurotaceae, Pluteaceae, Polyporaceae, Psathyrellaceae, Pyronemataceae, Repetobasidiaceae, Russulaceae, Rutstroemiaceae, Sarcoscyphaceae, Schizophyllaceae, Schizoporaceae, Sclerodermataceae, Sclerotiniaceae, Serpulaceae, Sparassidaceae, Stereaceae, Strophariaceae, Suillaceae, Thelephoraceae, Tremellaceae, Tricholomataceae, Tubariaceae, Tuberaceae, Typhulaceae, Xylariaceae

時間涵蓋範圍

起始日期 / 結束日期 1753-01-01 / 2018-01-01

計畫資料

In this publication we present the recently completed Global Alien Macrofungi Database, a database of distribution records of alien macrofungi aggregated from all relevant sources we could identify, namely publications, reports, databases on invasive alien species and citizen science observations. In total, the dataset contains occurrences for nearly 650 alien species, registered in more than 140 countries and sub-national administrative divisions. This represents an increase of nearly 2.5 times the number of alien records and 3.2 times the number of alien species found in the most comprehensive distribution database for alien ectomycorrhizal fungi available prior to our work (Velinga et al., 2009). The presented database is expected to provide a valuable contribution towards the increasing understanding of the spatial and temporal dynamics of biological invasions worldwide.

計畫名稱 A database of the global distribution of alien macrofungi
經費來源 This work was funded by the FEDER Funds through the Operational Competitiveness Factors Program - COMPETE and by National Funds through FCT, I.P. - Foundation for Science and Technology within the scope of the project “PTDC/BIA-EVL/30931/2017- POCI-01-0145-FEDER-030931” Miguel Monteiro was funded by an PhD fellowship SFRH/BD/119170/2016. César Capinha and Luís Reino were funded by National Funds through FCT, I.P., under the programme of ‘Stimulus of Scientific Employment – Individual Support’ within contracts 'CEECIND/02037/2017' and ‘CEECIND/00445/2017’ respectively. Franz Essl and Anna Schertler received funding by the Austrian Science Foundation FWF (grant 3757-B29).
研究區域描述 Countries and the first-order administrative divisions of the six largest countries in the world (Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Russia and United States).
研究設計描述 The creation of the “Global Alien Macrofungi Database” followed a two-step approach. In the first step, we performed an exhaustive search for data sources supplying occurrence records of macrofungi. In the second step, we harmonized the collected data and entered it into a standardized database. Our search and collation of alien macrofungi records was carried out during the years 2017-2019. For the first step, we analysed the database made available by Vellinga et al. (2009), who collected a total of 770 distribution records of ectomycorrhizal fungi from more than 190 publications. However, given the exclusive focus of the database on ectomycorrhizal fungi and consequential absence of data on saprotroph species, it can hardly be assumed that the patterns represented in Vellinga at el. (2009) provide a precise portrayal of the global biogeography of alien macrofungi. Hence, we built up on their database and additionally performed a complementary search for alien saprotroph fungi as well as any new records of alien ectomycorrizhal fungi. For the second step, all collected records were entered into two different data sets. First, we compiled a taxonomic checklist that accounts for all macrofungi taxa we found to be introduced outside their native range. Secondly, we described the according alien occurrences of those taxa including additional important data, such asdates of introduction, host information and occurrence remarks related to the population status in the invaded regions. Here, each entry corresponded to a single record described as alien taxon in a specific location. If a taxon in a given locality was reported multiple times by different sources, we merged the information into a single database entry and cited the first reference in time reporting the record. Data entry management and publication were carried out using the Darwin Core Archive format.

參與計畫的人員:

Luís Reino
  • 作者
Anna Schertler
  • 作者
Franz Essl
  • 作者
Maria Teresa Ferreira
  • 作者
Rui Figueira
  • 作者
César Capinha
  • 作者

取樣方法

The data collection process consisted of three different procedures, as it is explained below. 1)Identifying and obtaining relevant records from publications During the search process, we initially looked up for records in broader introduced taxa databases such as the ones from Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe (Hulme et al. 2019), Global Register of Introduced and Invasive Species (Pagadad et al. 2019) and European Alien Species Information Network (European Commission 2019). In a next step we used general-purpose search engines (i.e., Google) and scientific search engines (Google Scholar, Science Direct and jstore.online) to gather more information from relevant literature. We entered key terms related to fungal invasion in different languages including English, German, French, Spanish and Portuguese. The terms used were ‘introduced´, ’invasive’, ‘established’, ‘alien’ and ‘exotic’, which were combined with fungal taxonomic terms ranging from a generic and higher denomination (e.g. ‘fungi’, ‘macromycetes’, ‘basidiomycota’) to a more specific designation such as the scientific name (e.g. Amanita muscaria (L.) Lam., Amanita phalloides Secr.) or a common name (e.g. Fly agaric, Death cap). For each combination, we repeated the searches by adding the name of one continent or country, until all continents and countries were being considered. As examples, final search terms would be like ‘European alien fungi ‘, ‘introduced basidomycota in United States’ or ‘introduced Amanita muscaria + South America’. 2)Cross-checking of alien status For each record we assessed the reliability of the alien status given by the original data sources. Records collected from sources explicitly dealing with alien taxa (e.g., Vellinga et al., 2009), retained the nativity status given by the data. These statuses corresponded either to ‘alien’ or to ‘cryptogenic’ (sensu Essl et al., 2018). Records collected from non-specialized sources (e.g., species checklists not considering nativity, grey literature and citizen-science data) were cross-checked against biogeographical information available in the scientific literature or with mycologists. Cases where the records referred to regions outside known native ranges were coded as ‘alien’. Cases in clear biogeographical conflict with known native ranges were not considered for inclusion in our database. Finally, cases where the native or alien status was not possible to identify unambiguously were also not considered. 3)Occurrence data entry To be included in our database records had to meet specific criteria regarding taxonomy and locality description. First, a record must describe a macrofungal species which, that means it should have sporocarps at least 2 mm in size irrespective of phylogenetic placement (Senn-Irlet 2007). As this was not always clear, we had to double-check our data with relevant fungal literature to be sure that the families or even the orders of the referred species were cited as part of the macroscopic fungi checklists. We also had to be certain that the records were identified at least to the species level, as a way of knowing that all contemplated species were in fact alien organisms in the non-native places. Furthermore, the records had to be accompanied by geospatial coordinates or, at minimum, an unambiguous textual designation of location level reference (e.g., region, country, and locality). Finally, the record had to represent a fungal species introduced by human activity on a non-native region because it is the easiest way to be sure that the species was not native. These tasks were accomplished by the main author Miguel Monteiro during the years 2017-2019 with the supervision of experts in fungal ecology and biogeography. These experts were also consulted and asked if they were aware of records of alien macrofungi or of data resources other than the ones we identified through online searches.

研究範圍 We built our database by compiling occurrences of introduced macrofungal species based on intensive searches in published and unpublished sources. Data was extracted from peer-reviewed articles, scientific and technical reports, books and book chapters, alien species databases and online citizen-science repositories. Finally, we also approached selected mycologists via email. These experts were contacted and asked if they were aware of records of alien macrofungi or of data resources other than the ones we identified through online searches.
品質控管 For the development of the dataset the records from the original sources were revised by the first author because, some of the names of the species were not updated or sometimes misspelled. As a result, some changes at any of the taxonomic ranks (e.g. order, family, genus or species) had to be adopted in conformity with the used nomenclature. Even though, in cases of synonyms both names were included. The taxonomic revision of scientific names and data checking were performed by using Index Fungorum (Index Fungorum 2019) and Mycobank (Robert et al. 2019). To publish our dataset in the GBIF network we adjusted our records with the Darwin Core specifications (Wieczorek et al. 2012).

方法步驟描述:

  1. The creation of the “Global Alien Macrofungi Database” followed a two-step approach. In the first step, we performed an exhaustive search for data sources supplying occurrence records of macrofungi. In the second step, we harmonized the collected data and entered it into a standardized database. Our search and collation of alien macrofungi records was carried out during the years 2017-2019. For the first step, we analysed the database made available by Vellinga et al. (2009), who collected a total of 770 distribution records of ectomycorrhizal fungi from more than 190 publications. However, given the exclusive focus of the database on ectomycorrhizal fungi and consequential absence of data on saprotroph species, it can hardly be assumed that the patterns represented in Vellinga at el. (2009) provide a precise portrayal of the global biogeography of alien macrofungi. Hence, we built up on their database and additionally performed a complementary search for alien saprotroph fungi as well as any new records of alien ectomycorrizhal fungi. For the second step, all collected records were entered into two different data sets. First, we compiled a taxonomic checklist that accounts for all macrofungi taxa we found to be introduced outside their native range. Secondly, we described the according alien occurrences of those taxa including additional important data, such as dates of introduction, host information and occurrence remarks related to the population status in the invaded regions. Here, each entry corresponded to a single record described as alien taxon in a specific location. If a taxon in a given locality was reported multiple times by different sources, we merged the information into a single database entry and cited the earliest reference in time reporting the record. Data entry management and publication were carried out using the Darwin Core Archive format.

引用文獻

  1. Desprez-Loustau ML (2009) The alien fungi of Europe. In: Hulme, Philip E., (eds.) Handbook of Alien Species in Europe. Springer, Dordrecht, 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2007.01619.x
  2. Essl F, Bacher S, Genovesi P, Hulme, PE, Jeschke JM, Katsanevakis S, Kowarik I, Kuhn I, Pysek P, Rabitsch W, Schindler S, van Kleunen M, Vilà M, Wilson JRU and Richardson DM (2018). Which taxa are alien? Criteria, applications, and uncertainties. BioScience, 68: 496-509. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy057 https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy057
  3. European Commission (2019) European Alien Species Information Network- EASIN. https://easin.jrc.ec.europa.eu/easin [Accessed on: 18/09/2017] https://easin.jrc.ec.europa.eu/easin
  4. Hulme PE, Nentwig, W, Pyšek, P, and Vilà, M (2019). DAISIE: Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe. http://www.europe-aliens.org/ [Acessed: 20 September 2017] http://www.europe-aliens.org/
  5. Index Fungorum (2019). CABI Database. http://www. indexfungorum. org [Acessed: 20 January 2019]. http://www. indexfungorum. org
  6. IUCN (2019) Global Invasive Species Database GISD. Invasive Species Specialist Group ISSG. http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/ [Accessed on: 20/09/2017] http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/
  7. Katsanevakis S, Deriu I, D’Amico F, Nunes AL, Sanchez SP, Crocetta F, Arianoutsou M, Bazos I, Christopoulou A, Curto G, Delipetrou P, Kokkoris Y, Panov V, Rabitsch W, Roques A, Scalera R, Shirley SM, Tricarino E, Vannini A, Zenetos A, Zervou S, Zikos A, Cardoso AC (2015) European Alien Species Information Network (EASIN): supporting European policies and scientific research. https://easin.jrc.ec.europa.eu/easin [Acessed: 18 September 2017] https://easin.jrc.ec.europa.eu/easin
  8. iNaturalist (2019) iNaturalist research‐grade observations. https://www.inaturalist.org/ [Acessed: 18 January 2018] https://www.inaturalist.org/
  9. Troudet J, Grandcolas P, Blin, A, Vignes-Lebbe, R, and Legendre F (2017). Taxonomic bias in biodiversity data and societal preferences. Scientific Reports, 7: 9132. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09084-6 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09084-6
  10. Vellinga EC, Wolfe BE, and Pringle A (2009) Global patterns of ectomycorrhizal introductions. New Phytologist, 181: 960-973. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02728.x https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02728.x
  11. Vizzini A, Zotti M, and Mello A (2009) Alien fungal species distribution: the study case of Favolaschia calocera. Biological invasions, 11: 417-429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-008-9259-5 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-008-9259-5
  12. Wilson N, and Hollinger J (2019) Mushroom observer https://mushroomobserver.org/ [Accessed on: 18 December 2017] https://mushroomobserver.org/
  13. CABI (2019) Invasive Species Compendium. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. https://www.cabi.org/ [Accessed on: 10 October 2018] https://www.cabi.org/

額外的詮釋資料